Teams

CDTA S M40&O7.0 2.RT Schoyer Sat 5 $27

1Summer Mixed 40&O WN · WE

17 players · average NTRP 3.46 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesIvaylo Peroussanov / Lucie Kreidler vs Steven Betts / Elizabeth Cassier6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavis Scott / Linda DeNardis vs Sarah Haas / Jason Saculles6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Karp / Jazz Burks vs Neil Dyoco / Elizabeth Cassier6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesApple Naughton / Davis Scott vs Michelle Nacheman / Mark Ainsworth6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesDimitrina Schoyer / Michael Hong vs Alex Paz / Beatrisa Paz6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Gutowski-Hazzard / Tyler Hattery vs Cliff Breslow / Julie Alexander6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesJazz Burks / Amy Karp vs Misha Tseytlin / Jingyuan Sun6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTanja Boskovic / Davis Scott vs Emily Anderson / Charlie Turri1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJohn McKitrick / Dimitrina Schoyer vs Allycn Grcevic / Atwood Burns7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Gutowski-Hazzard / Davis Scott vs Christopher Tudor / Brooks Stenoish3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAmy Karp / Adrian Ciuca vs Rick Spurgeon / Lesa Vidovic2-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesDimitrina Schoyer / John McKitrick vs Thomas Stotter / Sue Christianson6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Adrian Ciuca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Jazz Burks
published 4
3.51
Michael Hong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Apple Naughton
published 3.5
3.41
Tanja Boskovic
published 3.5
3.39
Mariusz Cislak
published 3.5
3.38
Dimitrina Schoyer
published 3.5
3.36
3.34
Lucie Kreidler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
3.25
John McKitrick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Davis Scott
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Ivaylo Peroussanov
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Tyler Hattery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Amy Karp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Linda DeNardis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Daione Mitchell
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Apple Naughton + Mariusz Cislak291357% games+4.1% vs expected
Adrian Ciuca + Linda DeNardis4169% games+3.8% vs expected
Amy Karp + Jazz Burks5653% games+1.1% vs expected
Tanja Boskovic + Mariusz Cislak8460% games−4.7% vs expected
Dimitrina Schoyer + Mariusz Cislak13256% gamesnot enough data
Dimitrina Schoyer + Jazz Burks10461% gamesnot enough data
Tanja Boskovic + Ivaylo Peroussanov4356% gamesnot enough data
Adrian Ciuca + Daione Mitchell5259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adrian Ciuca
246W–154L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
4.06
4
Jazz Burks
229W–226L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Michael Hong
124W–70L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
3.5
Apple Naughton
225W–194L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Tanja Boskovic
194W–136L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Mariusz Cislak
254W–157L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Dimitrina Schoyer
286W–188L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Nicolae Cristian ROMAN
74W–44L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Lucie Kreidler
165W–131L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Mary Gutowski-Hazzard
75W–63L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
John McKitrick
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Davis Scott
34W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Ivaylo Peroussanov
77W–62L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Tyler Hattery
25W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Amy Karp
85W–83L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Linda DeNardis
56W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Daione Mitchell
96W–83L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.