Teams

Team 4 Trifecta

2022 NOVA Tri-Level Mixed · NOVA Tri-Level Mixed 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.33 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-14vs Team 1 Wise Ace GOATsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenny Herbek / Liviu Carare vs Kara Stevenson / Zachary Errickson2-6, 3-6
2022-10-12vs Team 1 Wise Ace GOATsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMalini Sekhar / Liviu Carare vs Aravind Krishna / Aisha Bhimla4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-09vs Team 3 Grace's AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Pennington / Yulia Taylor vs Christine Becer / Chris Ryan2-6, 5-7
2022-09-17vs Team 2 Triple Shots Mixed UpLost 01
L#1 DoublesVanessa Ogilvie / Liviu Carare vs Yiran Liu / Aileen Jones2-6, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level Mixed 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Malini Sekhar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.32
Barghav Hariharan
published 4.5
4.29
Liviu Carare
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Nathan Leslie
published
4.23
Yulia Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Bob White
published 4.5
4.12
John Pennington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
David Todd
published 4
3.81
Eric Ottenheimer
published 4
3.80
Alan Ogilvie
published 4
3.64
Jennifer DeCamp
published
3.60
Tracey White
published
3.45
Max White
published
3.34
Timothy DeCamp
published
3.12
Kristi Nault
published
Vanessa Ogilvie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Malini Sekhar + John Pennington033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Malini Sekhar
177W–94L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Barghav Hariharan
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Liviu Carare
227W–119L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
Nathan Leslie
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Yulia Taylor
49W–74L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Bob White
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
John Pennington
67W–79L career · 1 line in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
David Todd
58W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Eric Ottenheimer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Alan Ogilvie
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Jennifer DeCamp
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
Tracey White
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Max White
33W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
Timothy DeCamp
26W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Kristi Nault
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Vanessa Ogilvie
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.