Teams

Laureano/NLR/BP

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.62 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-19vs Crowder/NLR/LakewoodLost 03
L#1 SinglesFlorencia Bruzatori vs Sarah Rech1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJoyce Adame vs Margaret Jackson5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesChanda Price vs Leah Welker1-6, 2-6
2024-12-09vs Rutledge/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 SinglesChristi Callaway vs Micah Shaver4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChanda Price vs Lisa Hunt2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJoyce Adame vs Sarah Gold6-1, 6-0
2024-11-21vs Anthony/LR/CCLRLost 12
L#1 SinglesFlorencia Bruzatori vs Mary Nell McBryde0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesChanda Price vs Lauren Chandler6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesChristi Callaway vs Garrett Simpson Thalheimer2-6, 3-6
2024-11-13vs Herbert/Sheridan/BPLost 03
L#1 SinglesChristi Callaway vs Melissa Herbert6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJoyce Adame vs Kirby Wells6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesFlorencia Bruzatori vs Amy Ross4-6, 0-6
2024-10-28vs Adkins/LR/PVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesChristi Callaway vs Abby Adkins1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJoyce Adame vs Jessica Doose0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesChanda Price vs Lanie Driver1-6, 0-6
2024-10-24vs Miller/LR/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesFlorencia Bruzatori vs Jennifer O Kelley6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesChristi Callaway vs Jasmine Black1-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesAbbey Laureano vs Madolyn Miller6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Casey Bartlett
published 3
2.57
Joyce Adame
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.44
Abbey Laureano
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.44
Florencia Bruzatori
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.41
Chanda Price
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.29
Christi Callaway
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Florencia Bruzatori + Casey Bartlett1440% gamesnot enough data
Joyce Adame + Abbey Laureano123 matchesnot enough data
Casey Bartlett + Chanda Price033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Casey Bartlett
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58
Joyce Adame
24W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
2.5
Abbey Laureano
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
0%66%34%
2.44
Florencia Bruzatori
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Chanda Price
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%73%27%
2.41
2.5
Christi Callaway
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.