Teams

MIL:Scared Hitless:Inglese

2024 ECT Adult 18 & Over Women · 4.5 Women DAY 1S 2D

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-01-25vs GF:Tennis Emergency:Breeden/PonvertSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelanie Bowers / Crystal Cowles vs Christi Burton / Jane Farrington1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesPamela Jeppson vs Caroline Black6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-01-12vs GF:Tennis Emergency:Breeden/PonvertSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPolly Edwards / Allison Umbricht vs Teresa Panico / Celia Ponvert6-3, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPamela Jeppson vs Pamelia Parker2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSandra Eddy / Nancy Inglese vs Christi Burton / Kerry Shay3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCrystal Cowles vs Pamelia Parker6-7, 2-6
2023-12-01vs GF:Tennis Emergency:Breeden/PonvertSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPolly Edwards / Allison Umbricht vs Signe Breeden / Ann Lefler3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCrystal Cowles vs Pamelia Parker6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMelanie Bowers / Nancy Inglese vs Jane Farrington / Dani Woods1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCrystal Cowles vs Pamelia Parker2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesYvonne D'aquino / Denise Sousa vs Sarah Boone / Ann Lefler6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCrystal Cowles vs Caroline Black6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelanie Bowers / Nancy Inglese vs Signe Breeden / Teresa Panico1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesSandra Eddy / Denise Sousa vs Sarah Boone / Kerry Shay4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesPamela Jeppson vs Caroline Black1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Inglese / Ann Marie Schumsky vs Signe Breeden / Laura Palumbo1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Women DAY 1S 2D
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GF:Tennis Emergency:Breeden/Ponvert0715513138
2MIL:Scared Hitless:Inglese0741634226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Pamela Jeppson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.21
Denise Sousa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Allison Umbricht
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Kelly Thomas
published
3.98
Yvonne D'aquino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Crystal Cowles
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.85
Elichia Brown
published
3.84
Polly Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.78
Senta Cassell
published
Ann Marie Schumsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Nancy Inglese
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Melanie Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Eddy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elichia Brown + Kelly Thomas7653% games+2.6% vs expected
Senta Cassell + Elichia Brown19956% games+2.4% vs expected
Polly Edwards + Allison Umbricht3646% games−6.5% vs expected
Ann Marie Schumsky + Pamela Jeppson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Pamela Jeppson
155W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Denise Sousa
79W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Allison Umbricht
84W–60L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
Kelly Thomas
44W–26L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Yvonne D'aquino
127W–78L career · 1 line in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Crystal Cowles
47W–30L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
Elichia Brown
60W–44L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.85
4
Polly Edwards
172W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
Senta Cassell
114W–58L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ann Marie Schumsky
27W–46L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Inglese
68W–52L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Melanie Bowers
94W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Eddy
30W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.