Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-10vs CHABOT CANYON 40AW3.5A-DTWon 10
W#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Linda Choi vs Junko Green / Patti Presto6-4, 6-0
L#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Jill Owens vs Yolla Elahmadie / Viviana Meyer1-6, 3-6
2025-02-21vs ST MARY 40AW3.5A-DTWon 10
W#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Monica Ravanello vs Linda Hofmeister / Lisa Palma6-3, 6-4
2025-02-18vs BAY TREES PK 40AW3.5A-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Greer / Sandra Harris vs Minh Cannon / Divya Bala6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-10vs CENTENNIAL PRK 40AW3.5A-DTWon 10
W#1 SinglesCourtney Bock vs Michelle van de Pol6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Linda Choi
published
3.60
Sandra Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Diana Babayan
published 3.5
3.40
Monica Ravanello
published
3.33
Margaret Worden
published
3.29
Lisa Italia
published
3.29
Tammie Snyder
published
3.28
Courtney Bock
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Miwon Vella
published
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Jennifer Scriabine
published
3.10
Lori Guariento
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Italia + Miwon Vella4262% games+9.8% vs expected
Lani Aurelius + Tammie Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Linda Choi + Miwon Vella213 matchesnot enough data
Miwon Vella + Lori Guariento213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Choi
28W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.69
Sandra Harris
24W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Diana Babayan
26W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Monica Ravanello
26W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Margaret Worden
15W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Lisa Italia
13W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Tammie Snyder
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Courtney Bock
23W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Miwon Vella
23W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Jennifer Scriabine
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Lori Guariento
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.