Teams

Howell 18s 4.0W Thurs AM

2025 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-08vs NUNDKUMAR 18s 4.0W Thurs AMWon 10
W#2 SinglesMary Beth Hartman vs Leigh Abraham5-1
2025-05-01vs Kraska/Bettinger 18s 4.0W Thurs AMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Stephanie Bettinger6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Hartman / Catherine Stopka vs Ashley Jones / Kim Hunt7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-04-24vs Egerton 18s 4.0W Thurs AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesLayne Saunders / Whitney Ellis vs Kathryn Egerton / Sue English6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-17Split 11
L#1 SinglesMary Beth Hartman vs Susan Parsons5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLayne Saunders vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-10vs Kraska/Bettinger 18s 4.0W Thurs AMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWhitney Ellis / Layne Saunders vs Leslie Marus / Lindsay Olin6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Hartman / Catherine Stopka vs Mary Batts / Catherine Tanner1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-03-27vs NUNDKUMAR 18s 4.0W Thurs AMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Tammy Kasik6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMary Beth Hartman vs Leigh Abraham2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Stephanie Bettinger6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Bridget Gislimberti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Jordan Hedrick
published
3.95
Christina Campbell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Whitney Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Layne Saunders
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.81
Sherman Covington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Sarah Howell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.71
Sara Strassell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Catherine Stopka
published 4
3.64
Jennifer Mays
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.64
Tracy Harlan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Cj Isner
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.52
Mary Beth Hartman
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Nadia Gregory
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Ellis + Christina Campbell5076% games+17.7% vs expected
Jennifer Mays + Bridget Gislimberti241159% games+10.1% vs expected
Sara Strassell + Sarah Howell5263% games+5.8% vs expected
Nadia Gregory + Whitney Ellis404 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Harlan + Sherman Covington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridget Gislimberti
45W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.07
Jordan Hedrick
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.98
4
Christina Campbell
34W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Whitney Ellis
48W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Layne Saunders
151W–74L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Sherman Covington
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
Sarah Howell
32W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Sara Strassell
25W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Catherine Stopka
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Jennifer Mays
70W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Tracy Harlan
23W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Cj Isner
21W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Mary Beth Hartman
91W–66L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Nadia Gregory
13W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.