Teams

Watts/NLR/BP

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-02-09vs Rutledge/LR/RebLost 01
L#3 SinglesBrandi Watts vs Robbie Ward4-6, 3-2
2025-01-26vs Shaddock/LR/LRACLost 02
L#1 SinglesEmily Gates vs Natalie Gorman1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesHaylee Scott vs Christine Althoff2-6, 3-6
2024-12-19vs Shaddock/LR/LRACLost 12
L#1 SinglesHaylee Scott vs Mary Thalheimer0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTracy Foster vs Natalie Gorman3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesBrandi Watts vs Maeve Shaddock6-2, 6-3
2024-12-17vs Scott/LR/BPSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBrandi Watts vs Molly Scott6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTracy Foster vs Sarah Rech7-5, 7-5
2024-12-12vs Jennings-PVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesBrandi Watts vs Lindsey Wittenberg3-6, 2-3
W#2 SinglesDenise Allen-Duff vs Jo Margaret Bennett6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTracy Foster vs Keelen Verser4-6, 4-6
2024-11-14vs Hicks/LR/RebWon 20
W#1 SinglesEmily Gates vs Amanda Gray6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBrandi Watts vs Jessica Doose7-5, 4-2
2024-11-11vs Clark/LR/RebWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrandi Watts vs Susan Altrui6-3, 6-3
2024-11-06vs Scott/LR/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesBrandi Watts vs Briana Crowder6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesHaylee Scott vs Sarah Rech3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDenise Allen-Duff vs Leslyn Graves6-3, 6-2
2024-10-29vs Rabinowitz/LR/CCLRLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrandi Watts vs Hannah Rabinowitz1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDenise Allen-Duff vs Elizabeth Blackshaw1-6, 2-6
2024-10-22vs Johnson/Jacksonville/BPLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrandi Watts vs Malia Preston1-6, 0-6
2024-10-21vs Jennings-PVCCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEmily Gates vs Sarah Mathews6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBrandi Watts vs Lindsey Wittenberg4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Haylee Scott
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.06
Denise Allen-Duff
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.05
Brandi Watts
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
3.03
Emily Gates
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Holly Taylor
published
Tracy Foster
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Gates + Haylee Scott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Haylee Scott
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Denise Allen-Duff
36W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Brandi Watts
42W–24L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
Emily Gates
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
Holly Taylor
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Foster
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.