Teams

NWO 18&Over 6.0 Mixed Barden-Launchpad

2023 NWO Mixed 18 & Over · NWO MX 18 & Over 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-04-30vs NWO 18&Over 6.0 Mixed KelsoWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Wilkinson / Brittany Burnett vs Michael Kelso / Julie Ann Roehl6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDaniel Barden / Delia Perry vs Darin Freeman / Jennifer Smith3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesClayton Gifford / Rayna Zacharias vs Joe Sofo / Kim Sofo6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesGeorge Wilkinson / Brittany Burnett vs Connor Senn / Audriana Razzoog6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBruce Klinger / Michelle Hanus vs Kelly Wittenmyer / Brian Wittenmyer6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKevin Tiell / Jessica Lankford vs Jonathan Burns / Abby Burns6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesClayton Gifford / Amy Rockwell vs Darius Zolnor / Laney Fugett6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Barden / Brandi Walerius vs Franc Bialecki IV / Beverly Bundy6-1, 5-4
W#3 DoublesBruce Klinger / Michelle Hanus vs John Ewing / Mary Jacobs6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NWO MX 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Clayton Gifford
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.38
Brittany Burnett
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Delia Perry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Brandi Walerius
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Brittany Ford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Daniel Barden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Jessica Lankford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Michelle Hanus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
George Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Joseph Kinn
published
2.42
Rayna Zacharias
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Rockwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Bruce Klinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kevin Tiell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rich Hanus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittany Ford + Clayton Gifford5159% games+13.3% vs expected
Brittany Ford + Joseph Kinn3355% games+3.8% vs expected
Michelle Hanus + Rich Hanus5748% gamesnot enough data
Brandi Walerius + Daniel Barden3251% gamesnot enough data
Brittany Burnett + Daniel Barden134 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Ford + Daniel Barden224 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Barden + Rayna Zacharias224 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Kinn + Jessica Lankford123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clayton Gifford
148W–101L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Brittany Burnett
98W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Delia Perry
61W–25L career · 1 line in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Brandi Walerius
95W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Brittany Ford
60W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Daniel Barden
70W–95L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.96
Jessica Lankford
56W–51L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Michelle Hanus
112W–115L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
George Wilkinson
2W–0L career · type M · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Kinn
31W–80L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
Rayna Zacharias
76W–107L career · 1 line in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.42
Amy Rockwell
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Bruce Klinger
16W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Tiell
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Rich Hanus
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.