Teams

Bushnell TRI18 3.5/3.0/2.5 Mon

2023 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-24vs Tyler TRI18 3.5/3.0/2.5 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / Mary Winstead vs Amy Geer / Janet Howard7-6, 6-2
2023-06-26vs Jones TRI18 3.5/3.0/2.5 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLayne Saunders / Amy Kemp vs Cheryl Scott / Melissa Gujrati6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-26vs WURTH TRI18 3.5/3.0/2.5 MonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Winstead / Emily Wilson vs Lindsay Olin / Niddy Corrias0-6, 6-7
2023-06-12vs Meadows TRI18 3.5/3.0/2.5 MonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Dover / Layne Saunders vs Jennifer Yates / Allison Walsh0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJulie Brennan / Emily Wilson vs Tammy McGinn / Megan Noltemeyer2-6, 4-6
2023-05-22vs Taylordean TRI18 3.5/3.0/2.5 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / Mary Winstead vs Shannon Roley / Leslie Sheppard4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Layne Saunders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Julie Dover
published
3.04
Emily Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Mary Winstead
published
2.95
Melanie Burns
published
2.85
Amy Kemp
published 3
2.82
Luisa Cobos
published
2.68
Amy Mooney
published 3
2.66
Melisa Lyles
published
2.57
Simara Levi
published
2.57
Andrea Bushnell
published 3
2.35
Colleen Pinyan
published 2.5
Jenny McArthur
published
Julie Brennan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luisa Cobos + Amy Mooney224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Layne Saunders
151W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.87
Julie Dover
40W–22L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Emily Wilson
178W–123L career · 4 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mary Winstead
15W–22L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.02
Melanie Burns
27W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Amy Kemp
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
2.85
Luisa Cobos
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Amy Mooney
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Melisa Lyles
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Simara Levi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Andrea Bushnell
1W–39L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
2.5
Colleen Pinyan
8W–27L career · no lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
Jenny McArthur
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Brennan
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.