Teams

Je.Anderson40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-03vs Ju.Kelly40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlison Kalinowski / Karen Hepp vs Lowry Liggon / Jaime Gaskins7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesConnie Haynes / Emily Uhland vs Beth Holden / Elizabeth Newton6-2, 6-3
2024-10-03vs Je.Phillips40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Peters / Sara Mazurak vs Christina Jenkins / Heather Tuttle3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Uhland / Melissa George vs Emily Larson / Jane Hunter5-7, 4-6
2024-09-29vs Kr.Gilreath40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlison Kalinowski / Karen Hepp vs Jamie McCallum / Aulia Tandradinata7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTakako Schenberger / Merab Puleo vs Jenny Komes / Kristi Gilreath6-0, 6-2
2024-09-05vs Ch.Hochstrasser40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Anderson / Karen Hepp vs Garnett Webb / Ana DeHart6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesConnie Haynes / Sheila Breckenridge vs McGavock Edwards / Camille Gibbs6-1, 7-5
2024-08-22vs Su.Ruggles40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Skvarcius / Sara Mazurak vs Suzanne Brown / Dawn Johnstone6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Peters / Melanie Hewitt vs Meghan Kofod / Suzanne Ruggles6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSheila Breckenridge / Elizabeth Marriott vs Liza Gettles / Theresa Rosario-Jansen6-1, 6-2
2024-08-20vs Je.Phillips40CWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Fye / Emily Uhland vs Lisa Kempf / Emily Larson4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSara Mazurak / Ann Skvarcius vs Jane Hunter / Jennifer Brock6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Anderson / Karen Hepp vs Griffin Lamb / Julie Fleming6-1, 6-3
2024-08-15vs Al.DeMacy40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Uhland / Lauren Fye vs Jessica Williams / April Bazin7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTakako Schenberger / Elizabeth Marriott vs Allison DeMacy / Kristen Levine3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-01vs Ju.Kelly40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Peters / Sara Mazurak vs Tiffany Barrier / Emily Slater4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlison Kalinowski / Lauren Fye vs Ingrid Holscher / Kerry Ruggieri7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa George / Takako Schenberger vs Laura Brown / Abigail Douek6-0, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kim Peters
published
3.58
Lauren Fye
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Emily Uhland
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Ann Skvarcius
published 3.5
3.46
Sara Mazurak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Alison Kalinowski
published 3.5
3.33
Merab Puleo
published
3.29
Elizabeth Marriott
published 3.5
3.28
Karen Hepp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Takako Schenberger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Sheila Breckenridge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Melanie Hewitt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.89
Melissa George
published
2.79
Connie Haynes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Mazurak + Lauren Fye12562% games+6.9% vs expected
Connie Haynes + Karen Hepp11263% games+1.7% vs expected
Sheila Breckenridge + Karen Hepp9657% games+0.4% vs expected
Sheila Breckenridge + Connie Haynes261061% games−7.1% vs expected
Melanie Hewitt + Sara Mazurak10267% gamesnot enough data
Connie Haynes + Sara Mazurak6457% gamesnot enough data
Emily Uhland + Sara Mazurak7265% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Hewitt + Karen Hepp4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Peters
23W–22L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Lauren Fye
218W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Emily Uhland
87W–71L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Ann Skvarcius
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Sara Mazurak
168W–65L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Alison Kalinowski
27W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
Merab Puleo
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Elizabeth Marriott
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Karen Hepp
174W–98L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Takako Schenberger
243W–154L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Sheila Breckenridge
161W–94L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Melanie Hewitt
94W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
Melissa George
1W–20L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Connie Haynes
147W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.