Teams

EKennard (Park Road)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women - Wed PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-31vs MCBrown (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Amber Nee1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMargaret Cart vs Sallie Wilson6-2, 6-0
2024-07-24vs MGross (Queens)Won 10
W#2 SinglesMargaret Cart vs Katie Brigulio6-2, 6-0
2024-07-17vs AMatai/CChilders (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Beth Buckner6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMargaret Cart vs Vanessa Lowery6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesNicole Badr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-01vs AHeath (Queens)Split 11
L#2 SinglesNicole Badr vs Morgan Lee3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMargaret Cart vs Sally Licandro6-1, 6-0
2024-06-26vs MCBrown (Queens)Won 10
W#2 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Sallie Wilson6-1, 6-2
2024-06-20Won 10
W#2 SinglesNicole Badr vs Nidhi Lakkadi6-4, 6-1
2024-06-12vs AMatai/CChilders (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 SinglesMargaret Cart vs Carmen Childers6-0, 6-1
2024-06-05vs EOvercash (Springfield)Won 10
W#2 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Kathryn Collins6-2, 7-5
2024-05-29vs AHeath (Queens)Won 10
W#3 SinglesMargaret Cart vs Kara Tringali6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Cynthia Hoover
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.69
Marissa Kleber
published
3.54
Laura Grant
published
3.45
Elizabeth Kennard
published 3.5
3.39
Margaret Cart
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Molly Donohue
published
2.87
Nicole Badr
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
Barbara Davis
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Hoover + Nicole Badr8757% games+4.0% vs expected
Laura Grant + Marissa Kleber2451% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Kennard + Barbara Davis3255% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Cart + Molly Donohue123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Hoover
303W–124L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.69
Marissa Kleber
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
Laura Grant
36W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Elizabeth Kennard
27W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Margaret Cart
38W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
Molly Donohue
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Nicole Badr
95W–87L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Barbara Davis
23W–40L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
2.69
Mary Rebecca Harakas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.