Teams

AHeath (Queens)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women - Wed PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-31vs AMatai/CChilders (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesKara Tringali vs Beth Buckner6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSally Licandro vs Anita Matai6-0, 6-2
2024-07-30vs EOvercash (Springfield)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesKim Gissy vs Debra Schwede2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAbbey Ellis vs Amy Wiethoff3-6, 4-6
2024-07-24vs MCBrown (Queens)Won 10
W#2 SinglesAbbey Ellis vs Brittany Julian6-2, 6-3
2024-07-10vs MGross (Queens)Won 20
W#2 SinglesAbbey Ellis vs Mary Gross6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesKim Gissy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-01vs EKennard (Park Road)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesSally Licandro vs Margaret Cart1-6, 0-6
2024-06-26vs AMatai/CChilders (Park Road)Split 11
L#2 SinglesKara Tringali vs Vanessa Lowery3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesSally Licandro vs Anita Matai6-2, 7-6
2024-06-19vs MCBrown (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesKara Tringali vs Amber Nee3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKim Gissy vs Audrey Parker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-14vs MGross (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesKara Tringali vs Katie Brigulio1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-12vs EOvercash (Springfield)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKara Tringali vs Debra Schwede2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-29vs EKennard (Park Road)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesKim Gissy vs Elizabeth Kennard1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSally Licandro vs Laura Grant2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKara Tringali vs Margaret Cart1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
3.24
Abbey Ellis
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Kim Gissy
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.98
Wesley Campbell
published
2.95
Kara Tringali
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.93
Sally Licandro
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.66
Anna Sison
published 3
2.63
Anna T Heath
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Abbey Ellis
49W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Kim Gissy
98W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Wesley Campbell
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.98
3
Kara Tringali
75W–66L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Sally Licandro
50W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Anna Sison
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Anna T Heath
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.