Teams

8 Raintree Gromling's Single Ladies

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-30vs 18 Willow Oaks MayerWon 20
W#2 SinglesRebecca Schwartz vs Kelly Gregory6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAshley Gromling vs Zinie Sampson6-1, 6-2
2025-10-23vs 6 MRTC Northnuts - LeyLost 01
L#2 SinglesMadelyn Parikh vs Kate Waller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-19vs 4 Southampton Roper 3.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesRebecca Schwartz vs Deena Kretzer6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAmber Manry vs Pamela Hutzler6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMary-Margaret Whitten vs April Titler6-3, 6-1
2025-10-16vs 10 Woodlake Racquettes - PrestonWon 21
W#1 SinglesAshley Gromling vs Blanka White6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMary-Margaret Whitten vs Rochelle Preston6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesShannon Foster vs Sunanda Desai3-6, 3-6
2025-10-02vs 12 SCC Serve-vivors - WeisigerLost 01
L#2 SinglesMadelyn Parikh vs Mary Knick2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Laura Williams
published
3.45
Ashley Gromling
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Madelyn Parikh
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Rashelle Hayes
published
3.27
Rebecca Schwartz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.25
Shannon Foster
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Mary-Margaret Whitten
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.02
Christine Martine
published 3.5
2.97
Amber Manry
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Williams
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Ashley Gromling
23W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Madelyn Parikh
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Rashelle Hayes
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Rebecca Schwartz
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Shannon Foster
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Mary-Margaret Whitten
27W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.21
3.5
Christine Martine
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Amber Manry
4W–9L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.