Teams

12 SCC Serve-vivors - Weisiger

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.36 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-06vs 4 Southampton Roper 3.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesCatherine Baldridge vs Deena Kretzer4-6
L#2 SinglesBecky McNeer vs Alice McCollum4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBetsy Gibson vs April Titler6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2025-11-03vs 14 Westwood HarperWon 10
W#1 SinglesMary Knick vs Christine Albrecht6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-21vs 2 ACAC LewisWon 10
W#1 SinglesMary Knick vs Martinique Kandl6-2, 7-6
2025-10-14vs 16 MAC AbelWon 10
W#1 SinglesMary Knick vs Eleanor Gardner6-0, 6-2
2025-10-04vs 10 Woodlake Racquettes - PrestonWon 10
W#1 SinglesMary Knick vs Sunanda Desai6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMary Knick vs Madelyn Parikh6-2, 6-3
2025-09-25vs 18 Willow Oaks MayerWon 10
W#1 SinglesMary Knick vs Sallie Mayer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Becky McNeer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Catherine Baldridge
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Emily McClenny
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Mary Knick
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.32
Colleen Weisiger
published 3.5
3.10
Colleen Quattlebaum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.92
Betsy Gibson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Quattlebaum + Betsy Gibson4257% games+18.6% vs expected
Mary Knick + Becky McNeer123 matchesnot enough data
Becky McNeer + Catherine Baldridge033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky McNeer
30W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Catherine Baldridge
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Emily McClenny
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Mary Knick
204W–130L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Colleen Weisiger
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3
Colleen Quattlebaum
27W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Betsy Gibson
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.