Teams

Sets On The Beach

2023 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

20 players · average NTRP 3.94 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1And just like that…6232820259
2Swingin Wood62241639319
3PTSA53202040331
4Serve Me A Double 4.526142657408
5Sets On The Beach17103063410

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Lauren Drew
published 4.5
4.04
Anya Sandusky
published 4
3.90
3.88
Ashley Tribble
published 4
3.80
Jenny Grunke
published 4
3.80
Robyn Roby
published 4
3.79
Brijean Brennan
published 4
Amy Mikkelson
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Chelsey Melby
published 4
3.65
Lisa Hulsman
published 4
3.63
Kelly Sturdy
published 4
3.63
Angie O'Hara
published 4
3.61
Christine Elwer
published 4
3.61
Adriana Kurtz
published 4
3.48
Erin Perry
published 4
3.43
Jane Perlaky
published 3.5
3.31
Leann Gilberg
published 3.5
3.29
Janet Wilson
published 3.5
Lisa della Badia
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Meg Markley
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Tribble + Jenny Grunke7557% games+1.5% vs expected
Lisa Hulsman + Jenny Grunke181155% games−0.8% vs expected
Anya Sandusky + Robyn Roby201451% games−1.7% vs expected
Leann Gilberg + Angie O'Hara142143% games−2.8% vs expected
Jane Perlaky + Erin Perry6946% games−5.5% vs expected
Lisa Hulsman + Ashley Tribble4255% games−10.3% vs expected
Meg Markley + Kelly Sturdy2834% gamesnot enough data
Angie O'Hara + Erin Perry5156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lauren Drew
64W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
4.45
4
Anya Sandusky
187W–100L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
4.04
4
Christina Peterman
138W–91L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Ashley Tribble
182W–147L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Jenny Grunke
168W–146L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Robyn Roby
394W–188L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Brijean Brennan
140W–108L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amy Mikkelson
18W–33L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Chelsey Melby
118W–59L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Lisa Hulsman
68W–50L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Kelly Sturdy
93W–90L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Angie O'Hara
87W–147L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Christine Elwer
156W–133L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Adriana Kurtz
81W–65L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Erin Perry
68W–102L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Jane Perlaky
145W–183L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Leann Gilberg
124W–186L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Janet Wilson
151W–129L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Lisa della Badia
45W–36L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Meg Markley
18W–28L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.