← Search

Maureen Strieb

Selah, WA
0.0 year-end
81 matches · 49W–32L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Maureen sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Maureen is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maureen has been 4.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Maureen has gone from the 58th to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
71.1%
27W–11L · 56.2% of games
5.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.5% of games
9.0
65%
13W–7L · 59.5% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history81 matches
W
2023-03-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tami Davis
+0.008better than expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Edie Hall / Jill Leedom
2023-03-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chanel Nielsen
+0.014better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Reva Wallace
−0.011about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2023-02-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sheryl Brown
−0.012about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-01-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Yao Bailey
−0.068below expectation — took 29% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-01-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tami Davis
+0.012better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathleen Goyette
+0.036better than expected — took 59% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
Elizabeth Nott / Monique Eldridge
2022-10-22 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathleen Goyette
−0.020below expectation — took 46% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
David Robin / Melissa Chingmixed
2022-10-15 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sean Gueck
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2022-10-02 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Terra Yara
−0.015better than expected — took 86% of games against 79% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-09-25 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Brougham
+0.006about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-09-17 · #1 Doubles · with Laurie Ono
+0.006about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.