Search

Ashley Oakes-Lazosky

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
59 matches · 28W–31L · seasons 20192025
Where Ashley sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Ashley is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ashley has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Ashley has gone from the 47th to the 63rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
4.0
51%
26W–25L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
L
Aly Wagonseller / Mary Ford
2025-03-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Ashcraft
0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Maricel Renigen
2025-03-01 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.032better than expected — took 40% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-01-25 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.099below expectation — took 8% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Dawn Anderson / Marchelle Locke
2024-10-21 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandi Leedham-Erwin
0.024about as expected — took 75% of games against 75% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Bing Zou / Jamie Muaina
2024-03-25 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Oakes
0.001below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Christine Ballard
2024-03-03 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Rosemary Turner
2024-01-27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.020better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2023-09-18 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Levasseur
0.046below expectation — took 47% of games against 66% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Kelly Jackson / Jami Pappas
2023-02-27 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Oakes
0.056below expectation — took 0% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Stephanie Tegano / Terri Green
2022-11-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Unglaub
+0.040better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2022-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Beezley
0.008about as expected — took 42% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2022-04-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Beezley
0.085below expectation — took 41% of games against 70% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.