← Search

Kristi Beezley

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
74 matches · 41W–33L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Kristi sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Kristi is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kristi has been a steady 4.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kristi has gone from the 49th to the 50th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
55.4%
36W–29L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history74 matches
L
Judith MacKenzie / Melanie Cortez
2022-11-21 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Oakes
−0.027below expectation — took 32% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Bridgette Oconnor / Christine Blake
2022-11-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth McManus
−0.026below expectation — took 32% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2022-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Oakes-Lazosky
−0.008about as expected — took 42% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
2022-10-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth McManus
+0.009better than expected — took 92% of games against 74% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2022-09-19 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Ashcraft
+0.011better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-05-02 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth McManus
+0.009better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-04-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Oakes-Lazosky
−0.084below expectation — took 41% of games against 70% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2022-03-21 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Jones
−0.055below expectation — took 37% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Michelle Beckwith / Kelley Bailey
2022-03-07 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Ashcraft
+0.070better than expected — took 92% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Emily Schultz / JoAnna Edmonston
2022-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracie Chang
+0.012better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2022-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Oakes-Lazosky
−0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Ruth-Ann Edwards / Karen Lynch
2021-12-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Ashcraft
+0.011better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.