← Search

Cathleen Kozmary

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
153 matches · 91W–62L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Cathleen sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Cathleen is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cathleen has been a steady 4.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Cathleen has gone from the 35th to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
62.1%
72W–44L · 53.9% of games
8.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.9% of games
8.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history153 matches
L
Shelley Shalev / Mary Ford
2022-12-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Zanella
−0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-11-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandi Martin
−0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Kathy Shade / Marie Jocelyne Pink
2022-11-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debora Dean
−0.022below expectation — took 47% of games against 58% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Lindsey Lanni / V Kate Ferguson
2022-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy CookSjoerdsma
+0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
K C Scherrer / Karen Soderberg
2022-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy CookSjoerdsma
+0.005about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2022-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Zanella
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Barbara Fair / Candy Rosenberg
2022-10-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debora Dean
+0.002about as expected — took 56% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
2022-09-26 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy CookSjoerdsma
−0.047below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-09-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debora Dean
+0.038better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Peggy Wu / Gayl Fitzgeraldchamps
2022-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Sandi Martin
−0.018below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Jessica Ng / Kailee Christie
2022-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Zanella
+0.012better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy CookSjoerdsma
−0.026below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.