Search

Lora Mason

Seattle, WA
0.0 year-end
38 matches · 25W–13L · seasons 20192024
Where Lora sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Lora is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lora has been 4.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.520192020202120222024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
75%
6W–2L · 60.3% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.2% of games
8.0
70%
7W–3L · 61.5% of games
9.0
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history38 matches
W
2024-03-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Ogborn
+0.035better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Holly Wright / SuHyun Jung
2024-02-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Ogborn
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-11-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Fiebig
0.063below expectation — took 62% of games against 81% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2022-08-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Ferse
0.023below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-06-25 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy Rutter
+0.015about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2022-06-24 · #2 Doubles · with Lolly Bates
0.061below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Celia Waters / Kim Long
2021-10-31 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Rutter
+0.005about as expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2021-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Matyas
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2021-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Rutter
+0.042better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2021-10-02 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Matyas
+0.057better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Kristine Griffin / Kari Anderson
2021-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Matyas
+0.028better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2021-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maryse Sparks
0.086about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.