← Search

Linda Fiebig

Seattle, WA
3.5S year-end 2026
47 matches · 17W–30L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Linda sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Linda is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Linda has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Linda has gone from the 16th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.4% of games
4.0
20%
3W–12L · 44% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.7% of games
8.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
W
2023-11-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lora Mason
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 7-6
L
Maggie Miller / Darlette Knight
2023-10-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Nolan
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-5, 7-5
L
2022-11-06 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Scanlan
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-1
W
Marla Volpe / Lori Guincher
2022-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Scanlan
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisa McGee
−0.083below expectation — took 14% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Eva Banbury / Jayne Spector
2022-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Strohmeier
+0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Knoll
+0.048better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2022-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonne Bejan
−0.016below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2022-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Aupperlee
+0.004about as expected — took 47% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2022-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisa McGee
−0.024below expectation — took 62% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2022-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Broadwin
−0.034below expectation — took 38% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
Stephanie Joss / Colleen Blaikie
2022-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Aupperlee
+0.011better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.