Search

Rene Ahern

REDMOND, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
77 matches · 41W–36L · seasons 20192025
Where Rene sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Rene is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rene has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rene has gone from the 50th to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
57.5%
23W–17L · 52.1% of games
7.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 49% of games
6.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 55.5% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history77 matches
W
2025-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Lewis
+0.040better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Xue Song / Sarah Yoon
2025-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Feyerick
0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Anna Hundt / Hong Vo
2025-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Lewis
+0.021better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Rae Smith
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Chasin
0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-3
W
Rena Behar / Kathy Schmid
2025-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jude Neldam
+0.023better than expected — took 68% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beatrice Oltean
+0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-01-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jude Neldam
0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Matthew Levering / Allison del Giornomixed
2024-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Herrera
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Tina Zakahi / Armando Berdielmixed
2024-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Herrera
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Yogita MANGHNANI / Dee Ann Belsky
2024-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Arons
0.037below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Arons
0.035below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.