Search

Elisa McGee

Seattle, WA
0.0 year-end
35 matches · 8W–27L · seasons 20192022
Where Elisa sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Elisa is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elisa has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Elisa has gone from the 22nd to the 28th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.8% of games
4.0
23.1%
6W–20L · 41.9% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history35 matches
W
2022-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annelliott Willis
+0.086better than expected — took 63% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Edna Kainz / Nicole Smith
2022-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Crabtree Martin
0.084below expectation — took 20% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toby Miller
0.037below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2022-05-12 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.020better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2022-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Fiebig
0.086below expectation — took 14% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
April Victor / Lesley Ngwe Neh
2022-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annelliott Willis
+0.013better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Jillian Hagstrom / Melissa Boucher
2022-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Broadwin
0.065below expectation — took 37% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Broadwin
0.047below expectation — took 35% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2022-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Fiebig
0.029below expectation — took 62% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Elizabeth Kain / Lisa Lydon
2022-04-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Broadwin
0.007about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leona De Rocco
+0.015better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mila Niset
0.033below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.