← Search

Constance Marley

Woodinville, WA
0.0 year-end
47 matches · 26W–21L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Constance sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Constance is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Constance has been 4.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Constance has gone from the 69th to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
62.2%
23W–14L · 55.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
L
Annelliott Willis / Elisa McGee
2022-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camilla George
−0.087below expectation — took 37% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Archana Kumar
−0.031below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Omand
−0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2022-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emiko Way
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2022-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camilla George
−0.005better than expected — took 80% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2022-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roopa Satagopan
−0.029below expectation — took 40% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-01-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emiko Way
−0.021below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Ayiesha Selwanes / Jacquie Hartmann
2022-01-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Omand
+0.020better than expected — took 53% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
John Dai / Alison Shapiramixed
2021-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Fox
+0.000better than expected — took 55% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2021-10-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vijay Sankaran
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2021-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with JOHN GLOVER
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2021-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vijay Sankaran
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.