Search

Alicia Sato

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
76 matches · 32W–44L · seasons 20192025
Where Alicia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Alicia is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alicia has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Alicia has gone from the 74th to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
48.2%
27W–29L · 51.1% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 33% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history76 matches
W
2025-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Hong
+0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Jennifer Boyd / Patricia McKay
2025-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miri Rogers
+0.073better than expected — took 86% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-01-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miri Rogers
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexander Ung
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Edward Szymczak / Sarah Gustafsonmixed
2024-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Wann
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Hong
0.039below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yao Chen
0.038below expectation — took 48% of games against 62% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Addicott
0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam MacDuff
0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Hong
+0.002about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miri Rogers
0.001about as expected — took 62% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-02-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miri Rogers
+0.006about as expected — took 42% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.