← Search

Linda Barker

Beaverton, OR
0.0 year-end
30 matches · 9W–21L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Linda sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Linda is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Linda has been a steady 4.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Linda has gone from the 2nd to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 42.4% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.2% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history30 matches
L
2023-12-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Major
−0.008about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Heidi Wilcox / Julie Hansen
2023-10-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen McNairy
−0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-10-01 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Budnick
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 7-6
L
2022-10-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Bolte
+0.019better than expected — took 42% of games against 37% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Diane Ditmer / Jana Hirst
2022-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Bolte
+0.020better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-10-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Qi
+0.006about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2022-09-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Bolte
+0.071better than expected — took 75% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Qi
+0.028better than expected — took 47% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2021-11-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Bolte
+0.033better than expected — took 54% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Beth Burczak / Robin Collins
2021-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Bolte
+0.064better than expected — took 68% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Diane Harris / Janet Dowty
2021-10-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Qi
+0.035better than expected — took 60% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2021-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Bolte
+0.022better than expected — took 41% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.