← Search

Michelle Reynolds

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wheaton, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 72W–61L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history133 matches
W
2026-10-24 · NITA E 80W55d Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Daly
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-27 · CHI E 55W8.0 4.CC Carvell Sun 10 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erin Wyatt
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-08-16 · NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carlene Motto
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-11 · NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly O'Donnell
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · NITA S 75WCf Wheaton-LaBue/Reese · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Cleveland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · CDTA S 55&OW8.0 6.CC Carvell Sun 10 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Irene Powers
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · CDTA S 55&OW8.0 6.CC Carvell Sun 10 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margo Carvell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-24 · NITA S 75WCf Wheaton-LaBue/Reese · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christine Ripsky
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · CDTA S 55&OW8.0 6.CC Carvell Sun 10 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erin Wyatt
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · CDTA W 55&OW8.0 5.Centre Carvell Sun 10 $22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lara Phillips
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-5
L
2026-04-25 · NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carlene Motto
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · CDTA W 55&OW8.0 5.Centre Carvell Sun 10 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Behnke
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 53.2% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56% of games
7.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 50.3% of games
8.0
54.7%
35W–29L · 49.5% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.4% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova