← Search

Leslie Bernstein

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mercer Island, WA
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
28 matches · 15W–13L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history28 matches
W
2026-10-18 · BC-Imus · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pauline Snowden
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-03 · BC-Imus · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Watson
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-11-17 · BC-Watson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katrina Fleming
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-09-22 · BC-Watson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacy King
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-14 · BC-Watson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Clemente
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-09-16 · BC-Watson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marla Volpe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-09-08 · BC-Watson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Watson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2022-10-30 · BC-The Closers-Dunlop · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Watson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-10-23 · BC-The Closers-Dunlop · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Imus
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-10-14 · BC-The Closers-Dunlop · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Imus
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
L
2022-09-16 · BC-The Closers-Dunlop · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carla Iafrate
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2021-10-30 · BC-Dunlop · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kris Stimpson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.2% of games
8.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 64% of the time
#3 Doubles
64%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert