← Search

James Vavrek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 13W–34L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history47 matches
L
2024-05-13 · Crosscourt Traffic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Baker
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-06 · Crosscourt Traffic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Gabby
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-29 · Crosscourt Traffic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Baker
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-04-22 · Crosscourt Traffic · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Baker
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-17 · Crosscourt Traffic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Montamat
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-15 · Mixed and Matched · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Grunke mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-04-01 · Mixed and Matched · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mila Wood mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-26 · Mixed and Matched · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mila Wood mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-03-04 · Mixed and Matched · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mila Wood mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-02-25 · Mixed and Matched · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mila Wood mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-08-19 · The Jimi Hindrance Experience · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Baker championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2022-05-09 · The Jimi Hindrance Experience · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Warwick
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 44.4% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–9L · 36.8% of games
8.0mixed
29.4%
5W–12L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert