← Search

Amy Goss

— year-end
43 matches · 22W–21L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Amy Goss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
N/A
2022-04-14 · NITA W 40W18a TAM (Farinas) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yumi Ida
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Nick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-5
L
2022-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Cassier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-02-14 · NITA W 40W18a TAM (Farinas) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Daly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
L
2021-12-11 · CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Tam Lund Sun 1 $20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Salter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-5
L
2021-11-14 · CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Tam Lund Sun 1 $20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2021-11-07 · NITA E 40W18a TAM (Farinas) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eiko Tamaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-6
W
2021-10-10 · CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Tam Lund Sun 1 $20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-3, 1-0
L
2021-10-02 · CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0W Tam Lund Sun 1 $20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine Sheridan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2021-03-14 · NITA W 40W18b TAM (Farinas) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bess Celio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2021-02-28 · NITA W 40W18b TAM (Farinas) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams5 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 49.5% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 55.5% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert