← Search

John Walsh

Wilsonville, OR
0.0 year-end
22 matches · 13W–9L · seasons 2021–2023
Where John sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

John is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams28 teams · 2008–2023
CHARB-Noll
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2023
CHARB-Noll/McLain
2023 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2023
CHARB-Townsend
2022 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2022
CHARB-Noll
2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2022
CHARB-Townsend
2021 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2021
Charb-King/Jackson
2018 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2018
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 7.0, John has gone from the 72nd to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
7.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history22 matches
L
2023-04-28 · CHARB-Noll/McLain · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Noll
−0.024below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-27 · CHARB-Noll/McLain · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with KRIKOR NACCACHIAN
+0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
David Williams / Craig Walker
2023-04-21 · CHARB-Noll/McLain · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Noll
−0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
N/A
2022-11-19 · CHARB-Noll · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Lee
−0.012better than expected — took 100% of games against 87% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-10-15 · CHARB-Noll · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary McKenzie
+0.033better than expected — took 44% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-09-30 · CHARB-Noll · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Lee
−0.002better than expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
David Keller / Mark Rothertchamps
2022-05-26 · CHARB-Noll · #2 Doubles · with RICK ROGOWAY
−0.039below expectation — took 57% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Doug Orr / Bill Sturmanchamps
2022-05-25 · CHARB-Noll · #2 Doubles · with RICK ROGOWAY
−0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-05-12 · CHARB-Townsend · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with RICK ROGOWAY
−0.054below expectation — took 40% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Tom Bruggere / Bert Berends
2022-04-29 · CHARB-Townsend · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Reed
+0.036better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-04-21 · CHARB-Townsend · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Townsend
+0.050better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
John Bergin / David Williams
2022-04-14 · CHARB-Townsend · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Reed
+0.040better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.