Search

Marshall Reaney

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2024
67 matches · 34W–33L · seasons 20192025
Where Marshall sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Marshall is one of 930 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marshall has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Marshall has gone from the 10th to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
48.8%
20W–21L · 50.5% of games
8.0
52.2%
12W–11L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
L
Troy Fenn / Donnis Willis
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Wylie
0.025below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Luna
0.021below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Richard Vandermark / Michael Ivy
2024-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anthony Taeubel
0.023below expectation — took 45% of games against 57% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
William Feast / Dan Havriliak
2024-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anthony Taeubel
+0.036better than expected — took 92% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
David Schlatter / Michael Monroe
2024-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anthony Taeubel
0.012below expectation — took 53% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Michael Burnstein / Onidio Mirabal
2024-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Hou
+0.033better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-02-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Hou
0.022below expectation — took 56% of games against 63% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2024-01-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ren Lopez
0.057about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Algirdas Leskys / Kent Watts
2024-01-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Luna
0.008about as expected — took 55% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Justin Ramos / Jaden Tiriolo
2023-11-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Yergensen
0.069below expectation — took 14% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Robert Roig / Algirdas Leskys
2023-11-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Hou
0.014about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-10-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Luna
+0.057better than expected — took 63% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.