Search

Traina Giles

Aurora, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
38 matches · 17W–21L · seasons 20192024
Where Traina sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Traina is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Traina has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Traina has gone from the 37th to the 37th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
34.8%
8W–15L · 45.1% of games
7.0
60%
9W–6L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history38 matches
L
MICHELLE LY / Robyn Hilden
2024-03-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Taylor
0.084below expectation — took 25% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Groenweghe
0.053below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Hamilton
0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Vera Vos / Mary McCarter
2023-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Taylor
+0.033better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Sue Easton / Susan Judge
2023-10-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlene Enos
+0.014better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2023-06-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Angel
0.017below expectation — took 40% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Taylor
0.012about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Angel
+0.043better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-01-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Taylor
0.014about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-01-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sammie Sue Willenborg
0.033below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Lisa Schaller / Sue Griffith
2022-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Taylor
+0.059better than expected — took 92% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2022-10-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Raymonde Narlow
0.021below expectation — took 40% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.