← Search

Philip Pinkstaff

Federal Way, WA
0.0 year-end
53 matches · 13W–40L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Philip sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Philip is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Philip has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Philip has gone from the 11th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 43.2% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
7W–7L · 53% of games
8.0
25%
3W–9L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history53 matches
L
Clemente Villalobos / William Coats
2022-11-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Blaisdell
+0.002about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2022-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Blaisdell
−0.014below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
William Coats / Mark Hayter
2022-11-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kenji Yoshino
−0.032below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Bill Boyett / David Smith
2022-11-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Casale
−0.038below expectation — took 40% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-09-24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Charlston
−0.039below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Eric Henning / Jess Bouma
2022-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Coates-White
−0.003about as expected — took 42% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Hocker
−0.025below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Robert Bethke / Stephen Woolworth
2022-02-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Beard
+0.028better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2021-12-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave McDonald
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2021-11-21 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave McDonald
−0.013about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Bill Boyett / Dennis Hrdina
2021-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Mattson
−0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2021-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Sparks
−0.006better than expected — took 100% of games against 85% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.