← Search

Shannon Christiansen

COEUR D ALENE, ID
0.0 year-end
58 matches · 34W–24L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Shannon sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Shannon is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shannon has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Shannon has gone from the 81st to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.6% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.4% of games
6.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.5% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 51.6% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
Elke Barras / David Sharpemixed
2023-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chandra Srinivasan
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2023-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Wong
−0.014below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Melody McGowan / Bonnie Flock
2023-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lili Chang
−0.035below expectation — took 41% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2023-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Young
−0.016below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Susan Bonner / Katherine Chung
2023-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jean Waite
−0.003about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
2023-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jean Waite
−0.011about as expected — took 72% of games against 69% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2023-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Reynolds
−0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Akiko Koyama / Shiyao Dongmixed
2022-11-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kaushik Purohit
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelly Enstrom
−0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2022-10-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda la Cava
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kaushik Purohit
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2022-10-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Gurtler
+0.038better than expected — took 63% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.