← Search

Linda la Cava

Woodinville, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
93 matches · 53W–40L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Linda sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Linda is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Linda has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202021202220242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Linda has gone from the 69th to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
55.3%
26W–21L · 51.2% of games
6.0
60.6%
20W–13L · 54% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history93 matches
W
Marnie Bretz / Emily Doden
2025-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Wang
−0.009better than expected — took 86% of games against 76% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
−0.052below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Stephanie Hill / Kristi Edwards
2025-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roo Mulligan
−0.021below expectation — took 48% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ok Clark
−0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Carolyn Smith / Deborah Byrnes
2024-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
−0.025below expectation — took 40% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Seiko Kobayashi / Mayumi Willgerodt
2024-11-17 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynda Carlson
+0.017better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynda Carlson
+0.027better than expected — took 43% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Patricia Liner / Shelley Hagstrom
2024-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
+0.003about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Amy Higgins / Aki Emori
2024-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
+0.035better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Qiwen Hu / Meng Yang
2024-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynda Carlson
+0.029better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Constance Essinger
+0.019better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Asha DSouza / Amy King
2024-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Rooney
−0.040below expectation — took 48% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.