Search

Hildie Oliver

Beaverton, OR
0.0 year-end
43 matches · 17W–26L · seasons 20192022
Where Hildie sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Hildie is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Hildie has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Hildie has gone from the 62nd to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.4% of games
6.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 47% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 30.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history43 matches
L
Devrie Brennan / Jane King Ayers
2022-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Lanahan
0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Lanahan
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2022-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Wilkinson
0.040below expectation — took 44% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2022-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Thompson
+0.004about as expected — took 60% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Susan Sienko / Emily Shields
2022-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Mam
+0.037better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Jennie Ehleringer / Erin Gleason
2022-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Audrey Crespo
0.029below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2022-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with JaReda Webb
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Jing Li / Anh Phamchamps
2021-12-04 · #1 Doubles · with Stephany Mo
0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Chris van Leeuwen / Patricia Campbell
2021-11-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephany Mo
0.017below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2021-11-07 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Molly Saling
+0.031better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2021-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephany Mo
+0.008about as expected — took 58% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2021-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephany Mo
+0.029better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.