← Search

Ann Hays

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
42 matches · 16W–26L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Ann sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Ann is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ann has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Ann has gone from the 35th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
42.3%
11W–15L · 45.5% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 47.4% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history42 matches
L
2022-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Jeannette Martinez
−0.002about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Lisa Watkins / Cindy Bowen-Lorrainchamps
2022-06-25 · #2 Doubles · with Jeannette Martinez
+0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Dorothy Cofield / Wendy Smith
2022-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Crawford
−0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Geni Geannopoulos
−0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeannette Martinez
−0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeannette Martinez
+0.014better than expected — took 52% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2022-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeannette Martinez
+0.018better than expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Tanya Doubleday / Erin Gleason
2022-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeannette Martinez
−0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2022-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Elmer
+0.007about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Lisa King / Shuping Li
2022-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeane Anastas
+0.054better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2022-01-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Elmer
+0.026better than expected — took 59% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2021-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeannette Martinez
−0.017about as expected — took 65% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.