Search

Rachael Seeger

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
58 matches · 26W–32L · seasons 20192024
Where Rachael sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Rachael is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachael has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Rachael has gone from the 19th to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.0
45.6%
26W–31L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
W
2024-05-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
+0.034better than expected — took 65% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2024-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Murphy
0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 54% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Bigley
+0.006about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2024-02-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Bigley
0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Bifano
0.028below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.015about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
+0.039better than expected — took 65% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Carmen Timberlake / Deena Bothello White
2023-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Bigley
0.004about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Bifano
0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2023-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Gram
+0.015about as expected — took 42% of games against 38% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Bifano
+0.027better than expected — took 57% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Toni Mikel / Kelly Salhab
2023-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Bifano
+0.073better than expected — took 92% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.