Search

Rachel Emery

SHERWOOD, OR
0.0 year-end
19 matches · 12W–7L · seasons 20192023
Where Rachel sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Rachel is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams14 teams · 2014–2023
WHRC-Potter
2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2023
N OR-Lauritsen
2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Women
2023
WHRC-Potter
2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2022
WHRC-Oliver
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2022
WHRC-Jennings
2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2022
WHRC-Hodgson
2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachel has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history19 matches
W
2023-08-01 · N OR-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alena Lauritsen
+0.014better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-07-21 · N OR-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Mam
0.039below expectation — took 35% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Jennifer Johnson / David Beanmixed
2023-03-11 · WHRC-Potter · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Cormack
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 24% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Sarah Larson / Karen Kraus
2022-02-06 · WHRC-Oliver · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracey Hodgson
0.032below expectation — took 45% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-01-30 · WHRC-Jennings · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sumit Gupta
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 37% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-01-30 · WHRC-Oliver · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dayna Jahnke-Corwin
+0.015better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Minnie Bautista / Brandon Costonmixed
2021-09-11 · WHRC-Potter · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Dickinson
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Mihee Park / Wanda Ngchamps
2021-07-31 · WHRC-Hodgson · #3 Doubles · with Dayna Jahnke-Corwin
+0.022better than expected — took 65% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2021-07-25 · WHRC-Hodgson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Bolte
0.015below expectation — took 37% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2021-07-10 · WHRC-Hodgson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dayna Jahnke-Corwin
0.008below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2021-06-12 · WHRC-Hodgson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Bolte
+0.017better than expected — took 92% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2020-03-01 · WHRC-Hodgson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Mam
+0.006about as expected — took 60% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.