Search

Nathan Englund

Tacoma, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
12 matches · 5W–7L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 3.5
32 of 81
WA · 3.5
903 of 1624

Nathan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nathan has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history12 matches
L
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Piper
+0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Smith
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Piper
0.021below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Jesse
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-08-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Smith
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Justin Martin / Jin Park
2024-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Smith
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 7-5
W
N/A
2024-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Jesse
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Jesse
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Lindquist
+0.028better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Weiser
0.012below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2024-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rupesh Sansgiri
0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rupesh Sansgiri
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.