← Search

Philip Jesse

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tacoma, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 8W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history34 matches
L
2026-10-17 · TLTC-Kelley/Smith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-10 · TLTC-Smith/Nemetz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larry Gezelius
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-27 · TLTC-Kelley/Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Smith
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-04-01 · TLTC Smith-You Have Been Served · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Englund
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-22 · TLTC Smith-You Have Been Served · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Piper
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-11 · TLTC-Kelley/Smith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Duane Hulscher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-09-27 · TLTC-Kelley/Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Piper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-4
L
2025-09-21 · TLTC-Kelley/Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Tanbara
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-23 · TLTC-Smith 7.0 Men · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-09-28 · TLTC-Smith 7.0 Men · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Smith
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2024-07-16 · TLTC-Smith/Jesse · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Englund
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-07-01 · TLTC-Smith/Jesse · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Englund
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 50.3% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
15%
3W–17L · 37.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer