← Search

Jennifer Easley

POWELL BUTTE, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
64 matches · 36W–28L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Jennifer sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Jennifer is one of 1349 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 32% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202021202220232025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jennifer has gone from the 72nd to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
45.7%
16W–19L · 50.6% of games
6.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
Laurie Lober / Erica Carpenter
2025-12-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeanette Petersen
−0.049below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Carol Mallabone / Denise Black
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terri Langhans
+0.012about as expected — took 40% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Jessica Hawkins / Isabella George
2025-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Zika
−0.013below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jessica Inserra / Katherine Misskelley
2025-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeanette Petersen
+0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Meredith Bearov / Katherine Misskelley
2025-02-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eleonora Jeans
−0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Shannon McFarlin / Lara McFarlin
2025-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Zika
−0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Katherine Misskelley / Jessica Inserra
2025-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Waugh
−0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Isabella George / Jessica Hawkins
2025-01-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Loran Arvizu
+0.011better than expected — took 55% of games against 48% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-12-07 · #1 Doubles · with Caroline Flohr
+0.031better than expected — took 61% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Mari Revere / Eda Topur
2024-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathrine Wright
−0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Niki Froines
+0.007about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Caroline Flohr
−0.005below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.