Search

Mark Darienzo

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
41 matches · 16W–25L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
323 of 357
OR · 3.0
537 of 600

Mark is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams28 teams · 2014–2026
GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2026
PT&E/SJRC-McTague/Quinn
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men
2025
PT&E/SJRC-McTague/Hesslink
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men
2025
CAC-Quinn/McTague
2024 Adult 70 & Over · Men
2024
PT&E/SJRC-McTague/Quinn
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men
2024
PTC-Quinn
2023 Adult 70 & Over · Men
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mark has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mark has gone from the 20th to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
40%
8W–12L · 46% of games
6.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 42.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-05-12 · GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Carey
0.015below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Daniel Boyce / Randall Sinn
2026-04-23 · GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael McTague
0.061below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Dave Hardman / Daniel Boyce
2026-04-07 · GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael McTague
0.040below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-18 · GLVR-Kasch/Sasaki · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lars Kasch
+0.025better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-06-25 · PTC-Quinn/McTague · #3 Doubles · with Paul Best
+0.008below expectation — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Gamage Viriththamulla / Jeff Tragerchamps
2022-06-24 · PTC-Quinn/McTague · #3 Doubles · with Lars Kasch
+0.089better than expected — took 86% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Dave Sato / Surendranadh Movva
2022-06-05 · PTC-McTague/Quinn · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dave Sasaki
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-05-15 · PTC-McTague/Quinn · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Best
0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-04-24 · PTC-McTague/Quinn · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maarten Schreuder
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-03-26 · PTC-Quinn/McTague · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maarten Schreuder
+0.076better than expected — took 86% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2022-03-19 · PTC-Quinn/McTague · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maarten Schreuder
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
N/A
2022-03-12 · PTC-Quinn/McTague · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Quinn
+0.094better than expected — took 100% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.