← Search

Matthew Vannah

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
90 matches · 56W–34L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Matthew Vannah to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2021-05-22 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jack Braman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2021-05-15 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Vannah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2021-05-08 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Selinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Mister Archedon / Steven Brotman
2021-04-17 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Selinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2021-03-07 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parminder Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2021-02-27 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parminder Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2021-02-20 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Vannah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2021-02-13 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parminder Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Jeff Guenther / Mark Richards
2021-02-06 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN MacDONALD
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2021-01-30 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parminder Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2021-01-02 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN MacDONALD
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2020-12-05 · CLUB RIDGES #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN MacDONALD
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
69.5%
41W–18L · 55.9% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 58.2% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
3 matches
#3 Male Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer