← Search

Matthew Vannah

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
90 matches · 56W–34L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Matthew sits
79
2.5
852
3.0
1347
3.5
980
4.0
435
4.5
80
5.0

Matthew is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3773. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matthew has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Matthew has gone from the 74th to the 44th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
70.9%
39W–16L · 55.7% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 58.8% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 58.2% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
W
Graeme Donaldson / Travis Pardee
2021-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jack Braman
+0.029better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
SHANE SIGSBEE / Adam Austin
2021-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Vannah
+0.033better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Edward Song / Christopher Rathbun
2021-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Selinger
+0.025about as expected — took 25% of games against 25% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Mister Archedon / Steven Brotman
2021-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Selinger
−0.009below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Adam Austin / Peter Charland
2021-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parminder Kang
−0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
James Wichert / Tony Cimber
2021-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parminder Kang
−0.024below expectation — took 44% of games against 57% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Dino Mendicino / James Santos
2021-02-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Vannah
−0.032below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Marc Albert / Dan Hagin
2021-02-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parminder Kang
−0.023below expectation — took 62% of games against 67% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Jeff Guenther / Mark Richards
2021-02-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN MacDONALD
−0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Gary Miller / Sam Bauzon
2021-01-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parminder Kang
−0.042below expectation — took 57% of games against 70% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
ROBERT MANABAT / Valles Magno
2021-01-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN MacDONALD
−0.038below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
John Shook / Arthur Williams
2020-12-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN MacDONALD
−0.019below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.