← Search

Carrie Perry

Richland, WA
4.0C year-end 2023
131 matches · 82W–49L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Carrie sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Carrie is one of 1052 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carrie has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Carrie has gone from the 31st to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
93.3%
14W–1L · 73.4% of games
4.0
57.9%
22W–16L · 51.8% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
56.8%
21W–16L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history131 matches
W
Lucinda Fournier / Corey Weatherschamps
2023-09-30 · #1 Doubles · with Jim Perry
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-09-29 · #2 Doubles · with Jim Perry
−0.069below expectation — took 20% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Jill Stephens / David Garentmixed
2023-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Perry
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2023-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Perry
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-14 · #2 Doubles · with Jim Perry
+0.022better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2023-07-14 · #2 Doubles · with Jim Perry
−0.102below expectation — took 14% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Sarah Miller / Val Otto
2023-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen McAteer
+0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Melanie Redding / Megan Miller
2023-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Xia Suter
−0.050below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Melissa McDowell / Aspen McKenna
2023-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen McAteer
−0.021below expectation — took 32% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Laura Cremers / Lisa Hagen
2023-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen McAteer
+0.028better than expected — took 65% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Karen Wasylyshyn / Holly VanderSchalie
2023-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Xia Suter
+0.012better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Wendy Teets / Ashlie Unruhchamps
2023-04-23 · #1 Doubles · with Jacquelyn Jaech
−0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.