← Search

Kirk Hill

Rochester, WA
0.0 year-end
59 matches · 34W–25L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Kirk sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Kirk is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kirk has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020212023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Kirk has gone from the 81st to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 55.6% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.3% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
L
2023-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Earl
−0.044below expectation — took 38% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2023-01-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barron Willis
+0.004better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2022-06-25 · #2 Doubles · with David Earl
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-06-24 · #1 Doubles · with Matt Purcell
+0.007about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Ted Bailey / David Gano
2021-12-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Earl
+0.032better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Kevin Keiler / Steven Lockett
2021-11-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Earl
+0.013better than expected — took 60% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2021-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Earl
+0.025better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Gilbert Garcia / Dale Meints
2021-11-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jerry Saul
+0.047better than expected — took 92% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Wes Williams / John Dunnaback
2021-10-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Earl
+0.003better than expected — took 68% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Stephen Hughes / David Hunter
2021-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Groven
+0.030better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
John Curry / George McClure
2021-09-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barron Willis
−0.033below expectation — took 35% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2021-08-14 · #2 Singles
−0.063below expectation — took 0% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 4-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.