← Search

Megan Daniels

Lake Oswego, OR
0.0 year-end
49 matches · 29W–20L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Megan sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Megan is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Megan has been 3.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Megan has gone from the 38th to the 78th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 57.6% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
Michelle Coleman / Jennifer Noble
2021-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Eddy
−0.056below expectation — took 35% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2021-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janice A Moore
−0.051below expectation — took 8% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2021-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janice A Moore
+0.009better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Jennifer Lucas / Paula Jacobsonchamps
2021-05-23 · #3 Doubles · with Kathryn Eddy
+0.014better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2021-05-22 · #1 Doubles · with Kathryn Eddy
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2021-05-21 · #1 Doubles · with Kathryn Eddy
−0.056below expectation — took 29% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Jeri Finn / Mary Marsh
2021-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Eddy
−0.012about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Amy Cooney / Sara Stewart
2021-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Eddy
−0.040below expectation — took 55% of games against 68% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Eddy
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2021-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Eddy
+0.028better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2021-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Findley
+0.011about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2021-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Daugherty
−0.029below expectation — took 47% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.