← Search

Sarah Gabel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 50W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history94 matches
L
2026-06-22 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Hamilton-SCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly O'Connell
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Hamilton-SCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Babkiewicz
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Hamilton-SCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly O'Connell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-12-02 · NWO Combo 6.5W DAY O’Connell/Gabel-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Moewe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-25 · NWO Combo 6.5W DAY O’Connell/Gabel-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Molly O'Connell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-5
L
2025-11-18 · NWO Combo 6.5W DAY O’Connell/Gabel-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Krebs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-11 · NWO Combo 6.5W DAY O’Connell/Gabel-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Annie Babkiewicz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-30 · NWO Combo 6.5W DAY O’Connell/Gabel-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Moewe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-3
L
2025-09-23 · NWO Combo 6.5W DAY O’Connell/Gabel-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lydia Schafer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-14 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Cody/Sofo -SCC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Santacroce
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-25 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Day Gabel/O’Connell-SCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Schneider
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Cody/Sofo -SCC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Santacroce
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 49.5% of games
3.0
55.6%
20W–16L · 49.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 53.5% of games
6.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.1% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer