Search

Thuong Pham

Everett, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
251 matches · 156W–95L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.59
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 29 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
13%
down to 3.5
87%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 9% down · 91% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.61. Higher than today’s 3.59 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Everett · 4.0
7 of 8
WA · 4.0
577 of 782

Thuong is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Thuong has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Thuong has gone from the 21st to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.4% of games
3.5
74.2%
46W–16L · 57.7% of games
4.0
36.4%
20W–35L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.1% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
28W–16L · 56% of games
8.0mixed
80.8%
21W–5L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history251 matches
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Acuario
+0.009about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Pia Westen / Mycah Gambrell
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Marrero
+0.011about as expected — took 32% of games against 33% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kana Waldron
+0.026better than expected — took 57% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kana Waldron
+0.010better than expected — took 72% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Morgan Hunter / Heather Seeley
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Anderson
0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley Walters
0.039below expectation — took 28% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justine Bang
0.031below expectation — took 42% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Ung
0.024below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Sarah Foster / Jutta Maas
2026-03-15 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Lee
+0.010better than expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-4
L
Elizabeth Baker / Morgan Hunter
2026-03-07 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Shanna Chua
0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-2
W
2026-02-28 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Jasmine Wijaya
+0.037better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-2
L
Nicole Minassian / Yimeng Song
2026-01-31 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Shanna Chua
0.049below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.